Mercy

I wake up, at 04:50, approximately, Norwegian time, and get it, by some reasoning, my lionesses are talking with the U.S.A. about insanity. That is my presumption. That is why I write this blogpost without any preperation, directly on Blogger.

What is the difference between unintelligence and insanity? Of course it is lack of intellectual control which signifies both. What is hysteria? Hysteria was the label on the psychotic one's when Freud started studying insanity. How come Frud used hypnosis as the way to treat insanity? Of course, because he did not reach the anxiety ridden pasients because of defence mechanisms. Why was Freud never able to pin point how to heal psychotic pasients? He wrote it was the purpose of psychology to study and explain how this super-ego (a later label) could be understood? Of course because hopnosis by nature makes people extremely anxious. Dependent.

How was the treatment before Freud? It was called "to magnetize". Indeed, "to magnitize" also is a method one must see in a historical and cultural context. Stefan Zweig, in "Helbredelse ved Aand" (in Norwegian i 1931, published by H. Aschehoug & Co) wrote: "Å magnetisere betyr fra 1776 av hos Mesmer altså ikke lenger å berøre eller påvirke med et magnetjern, men ene og alene å la menneskets hemmelige "animalske" kraft som stråler ut fra fingrenes nerveender virke på andre mennesker. Og når [ ] idag de som praktiserer denne sympatetiske strykebehandling kaller sig magnetopater, så bærer de dette navn fullstendig urettmessig; for høist sannsynlig har ikke en eneste en av dem et magnetjern i sitt hus. Hele deres behandling beror utelukkende på personlighetspåvirkning, på suggestiv eller fluidal terapi." [Zweig henviser til Mesmer]

Hypnosis must be an old affair. I believe Lot must have been hypnotized - and exploited. In science, hypnosis was definitely coined by Braid in 1843 in his book "Neurypnologi". Zweig discusses the development from Mesmer to Freud (mesmerism).

What is mind control? Let me point out; what is super-ego? Of course expectation.

Stefan Zweig går kraftig til rette med Christian Science, gitt lyd ved Mary Baker i 1875 (Mary Baker-Eddy). Hun avviste alle sykdommer som forestillinger, og pekte på Jesus Kristus som den eneste lege. "Hans metode var helbredelse uten diagnose og teori, ene og alene ved tro." (Zweig) Hun viser til den kristelige videnskapssannhet, skriver Zweig, at all sykdom er "error" og "bad habit". Den aller farligste sykdom er troen på sykdommen. Zweig kaller Mary Baker "denne uhørte makt".

So, what is there to see? Zweig points out these words by Nietzsche:

Wie viel Wahrheit erträgt, wie viel Wahrheit wagt ein Geist? Das würde für mich immer mehr der eigentliche Wertmesser. Irrtum - der Glaube ans Ideal - ist nicht Blindheit, Irrtum ist Feigheit ... Jede Errungenschaft, jeder Schritt vorwärts in der Erkenntnis folgt aus dem Mut, as der Härte gegen sich, aus der Sauberkeit gegen sich."

HELT VILT

I visse kretser er det vilt
at Kristus ikke er bestilt
men fryktes som en dommedag.
Som om slik frykt var til behag!

(Trixnix walls | here |)

.·: † :·.