Ad That Question of Our Times

Ex Rege Lex, or Ex Lege Rex - that is the question, in Latin.

In the Constitution of Norway, it is so that "Ex Lege Rex". I defend the Constitution of Norway.

.·: † :·.

Ad Bestiality

Prove me wrong, though, there seems to me to be a lack in any religion when it comes to tackling bestiality. There are laws in any religion with regards to morale, and to kill not is one in all, I believe, though, torture, is it given heed? I believe I heard, once, one stating it is a matter of natural law that this thing to see one of his kind suffer, forbids torture. One will not tolerate it. This view would be in harmony with the Norwegian, and English notion of conscience, and also of humane to be. Humanity is a kind. During World War II, horrific bestiality was shown by the Nazis, and also by their Asian counterpart. And in Nazism there was this notion of the “Untermänsch” as different from the “Übermänsch”. Perhaps this was the reason why this beautiful people of Germany came to foster this horror.

In any Christian nation, I believe, bestiality is considered in the judgemental system. In court, obviously showing bestiality has bearing on punishment. One cannot by law forbid bestiality, in Christian nations. So to do would be in conflict with the principle of legality. Though, religion? There should be focus in any church of belief on the well-being of human kind, that is on heart, mind and soul. This would be faith, hope and charity – the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

.·: † :·.

Remember The All

Remember the all
of Father's the call.
Humanity is
the essence of this.

And be free and wild,
and peaceful and mild,
in Love of The Son
by which one is done.

.·: † :·.

The Tounge of Norway

Norwegian is the toungue
of nature's vivid throng
as it is pretty wild
and comforting and mild.

In good relations it
to learn, so quite a bit,
the toungue of Norway just
to future is a must.

.·: † :·.

Sorry about That

Vaccinius ™ · Sorry About That (*)

SORRY ABOUT THAT

[Intro]

Verse 1]
To be indecent is not it,
by which to loving one is fit.
Indecent, always, will it end,
what is on future to depend.

[Verse 2]
And this is surely not good to
the good Lord, who is making you.
and who is He who powers life.
He wants you to be lovely wife.

[Chorus]
Who made this absolutely fail
idea, that bad is of avail?
Who is it, who is making you?
What name it has, that thing to do?

[Verse 3]
You know, by now this is enough.
There is no question, to be tough.
The devil you have made the one
to be by, which the life is done.

[Chorus]
Who made this absolutely fail
idea, that bad is of avail?
Who is it, who is making you?
What name it has, that thing to do?

[Verse 4]
Be rationale, and hit the core:
the dark, the void, who you adore,
is just a failure, out of love,
and really stupid to be of.

.·: † :·.

Hypnotized You Are

.·: † :·.

Outstanding

.·: † :·.

Physics

It is a fact, men and women think a bit differently. Men might think strategically, which the woman have difficulties doing, disposed to think tactically, as she is. A woman might do the work of man (old Norwegian saying). The fact is, though, when stating a truth, she will always be bound to her gender – her body. In science, and in the art of poetry, a difference is to be seen between men and women.

In physics, there are three orientations. There is pure physics, there is chemistry, and there is biology. The way of thinking differs. The smallest particle in physics is the electron, in chemistry the atom, and in biology the cell. And it is my intuitive understanding the electronical activity in the body, in the nerves, that is, cannot be understood theoretically by pure physics. And chemistry cannot explain it. No reaction is to be found. And biology is not occupied with the beings of nerves. Bound to the material, electronical activity is difficult to explain. The electrons obviously are not free.

Neither in air, the electrons are free. Air is O². And there is no reaction taking place in air by blue-tooth, for example. So what? Is there a difference between women and men? Why is the woman bound?

I think there must be an electronical field around the globe, giving opportunity to electronical signals. This field is in the air, chemically speaking. O², that is. Electronical activity in the substance of air?

There are things to learn I believe, also in physics. Let us take the step?

[Addition - a couple of minutes after this posting:]

Sound might penetrate a wall, though being reduced. Why will not light?

.·: † :·.

Thinking

Vaccinius ™ · Thinking (*)

THINKING

Why on earth cannot people this obvious see:
Superpowers are met in my country, today.
Neither women nor men are to be something free,
by one’s sins and by slavery waiting for day.

I beg you to take care of yourselves, and let us
find together by faith in tradition, and thus
able to hope and dream, carry burdens to God
which by we shepherd’s crook will see, and not the rod.

In the future we will talk together, and find
many things to discuss and to make and to mind.
Though, right now we want peace from the being of you.
We have our own problems, and ours to do.

Please, take care in Great Brittain, my closest of friends.
Let us see where this leads us, put horrors to ends.
And in Russia, please, understand my concern.
I am not in the middle. To land I will turn.

And to the U.S.A. and to China I’ll say,
leave my people, or I for sure will make your day.
It is Norway which is my belonging and pride.
In this moment, the both of you are set aside.

.·: † :·.

Buddhism

Prove me wrong, though, to me it seems like there is a logical flaw in buddhism. The essence of buddhism, I understand, is reaching nirvana, which is a state of release and disembodiment, which one reaches through a correct path. That nirvana is material not to be, devoid as one is of motives and feelings, full of wisdom and correct values. The core value, though, seems to be discipline. There is a correct path, and devotion to beings. And that is the thing: One never is of no value and no worth, and speaking of it, who wants to be? By discipline, one becomes a follower, a student, a disciple, and as such, not to be of worth? Of no value to the school, to the church, the community, the society?

To me it seems buddhism is a path towards self-upheaval, by which one only is good, serving anyone. Though, precence? Who wants to be lost?

Does one better one's mind by concentration? Of course. Though, fixing it on a correct path? And on serving? Tragic, it is.

By the way; if nirvana is reachable, as a state of mind, dependent on learning, God is profane.

.·: † :·.