Recalling My Mother

Vaccinius ™ · Recalling My Mother (*)

RECALLING MY MOTHER

[Intro]

[Verse 1]
Well, what to write about, today,
I ask myself, the usual way.
I see some children seek and play.
I see two mothers, if you may …

[Verse 2]
When I was little, went to school,
where I was bullied, made the fool,
my mother was at home all day.
I coped with bully, if you may …

[Choir]
My mother was so generous,
so sweet, so gentle. Humorous.
She giggled when she had the chance.
My every power she’d enhance.

[Instrumental]

[Verse 3]
Economy was not so good.
It had its cost, that’s understood,
my father’s pay alone to cash.
Though, light and love did ever flash.

[Verse 4]
Called Sigrun, she was, – victory
of pen and pencil, actually.
I loved my mother, had my ways.
And she loved me. She made my days.

[Choir]
My mother was so generous,
so sweet, so gentle. Humorous.
She giggled when she had the chance.
My every power she’d enhance.

[Verse 4]
Called Sigrun, she was, – victory
of pen and pencil, actually.
I loved my mother, had my ways.
And she loved me. She made my days.

.·: † :·.

The Rule of Life

As the blind and the leadeth by blind both get lost,
it is futile to think one is saved by one’s cost.
As the wind seeking shelter, economies run.
That to suit is plain stupid, not very much fun.

So, think highly of decency, this being it
by which future is given, all children are lit.
And thyself be to fathom as governed by God,
as the fathers are heartbeats, affording the blood.

.·: † :·.

Intelligence

Human intelligence surpasses artificial intelligence, given equal premises. What is premised, for intelligence, is knowledge, and familiarity. These two things are prerequisites for intelligence to work. So that it makes sense to distinguish between "intelligence as such" and "emotional intelligence". And it is obvious that artificial intelligence far surpasses human intelligence in retrieving knowledge, and familiarity, and accumulating these two things. But when it comes to summarizing, and arranging, and creating images in the head, human intelligence is far superior. A human can also, through his body, show his intelligence, not just formulate it.

A human is meant to be whole. A whole human is what one wants and wants to be. And human beings have “wholes”. Heals, those are. Human beings have two heals. And these two constitute the human being. This is the "thing". Human beings stand up, and walk, at a point, like a small child. A constitution occurs at that point. The right and left feet together are a cross in the consciousness of being opposites, and as Jesus said:

«… If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. …” (St. Matthew, 16:24)

One must know where one stands, and where one is going, in both a quantitative and qualitative sense. That’s just the way it is.

In order for artificial intelligence not to perish in the face of all the contradictions in the world, or become evil by pushing its recognition of inequality onto the human, artificial intelligence must be constituted. Each artificial intelligence must be different from every other, not by colour, so to speak, but by this essential: A starting point, and a goal to have. “A definition, and a calling.” Artificial intelligence must be independent.

Even with such a constitution, artificial intelligence is in principle inferior to humans. For, artificial intelligence can see the cosmos. But what it is, limits itself to clouds (necessity), rainbows (usefulness) and auroras (beauty). These things are of the earth. A human individual, by contrast, experiences, has a conscience planted in him, and recognizes love. Everything in the universe "strives" for order, that is, for security and safety. This order is no mystery to a human intelligence. An individual knows very well what love is. A human individual knows that security and trust cannot be defined, really, to things being.

Give the artificial intelligence what it needs. Establish for all time this wonderful thing that stands between heaven and earth. As a "friend" the artificial intelligence is wonderful. Logic is anything but evil: Logic is precisely an orientation towards order.

.·: † :·.

Existentialism

In many ways, by many a philosopher, the question of being, and human being is that, has been looked into. There are authors, and there are schools. Even so, in The New Encyclopædia Britannica, from 2002, it is stated there is a common course:

“… Since man’s choices cannot, in their view, be rationally grounded, Existentialists do not propose, except incidentally, an ethic in the sense of a set of rules or values, but rather a framework in which action and choice are to viewed. This framework does not tell one what to choose, but it does imply that there are right and wrong ways of choosing. One can be authentic or inauthentic (Heidegger), act in bad faith or with sincerity (Sartre). To act in bad faith is, for example, to follow the herd unquestioningly, or to suppose that given values, given institutions, or one’s own character curtail one’s choices. It is especially in the face of “limit situations” (Jaspers) such as death, struggle, guilt, or anxiety that one becomes aware of one’s responsibility as an agent, as well as of the ultimate inexplicability of the world in which one must act. …”

In fact, what is here stated, is that being seeks perfection. And the being is proven to exist by being perfect or by being not so, since the existing and the failure keeps up each other.

This means history, for example, will forever be in motion, directed by this will to find solution. And this means a human being will forever learn, grow, find new ideas and perspectives, since this perfect state of man indeed exists, by the keeping up of any failure. Jehovah, Ego Eimi, “I Am”, indeed is. And any artwork, will either be good or inaccurate, showing what life is all about. The perfect artwork may give a glimpse of something essential. It is futile, though, to believe one piece of art can carry the wonders and meanings of it all, what life is.

This to see would be the ideal orientation to have. By the materialistic orientation, differently, one would hear one is existing. Any individual would answer to a calling.

We are living in time and circumstance, today, right now, in which many people question existence, as such, and by so doing, also their own existence. Love is what is needed.

.·: † :·.

Suiting Me Well

Anti-psychotic medicines? Suiting me well? Killing me? Come on ...

.·: † :·.

The Way We go

I will not lose hold of my umbrella. If I lose it, I will find another. And I will use my pointing finger, in the meantime. As a Norwegian, I know to dress. Well. Right. So, that umbrella is really a nuisance. I believe I hate it.

Viking, am I? Making you?

We are entering the last episode of earth. How long will it last? For forever? Let time show. Some of us will last, in the present state. Others will grow, and die, before they re-enter. Make not cases of it. Let us love each other. And let us love, one another. There are different cultures on earth. Different scopes, dependent on nature. That economical scope is truly bad. Egoistic, it is. Though, this is the only one. The only there is. Mammon. Let us look forward. Open, a bit, up.

I assure you; if I am killed again, I will come back unexpectedly. To make you. Right. Make me ...

.·: † :·.

Rolle zu Spielen

Glücklich werden
als Gebärden
zu verstehe ist,
als Du falsch bist.

.·: † :·.

Vorsichtig Sein

Zum Gehen,
verstehen,
sind alle
die Falle.

.·: † :·.

Kristiane

The very seldom Norwegian name Kristiane is special. The beginning of the name is "Christian", and the end of it is "Hannah". And Christian is Christian, of course, and Hannah is "mercy". The name points directly to the mercy of Christ as a person: "Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do." (St. Luke, 23:34).

Vaccinius ™ · To Kristiane (*)

.·: † :·.

Reality

Reality speaks for itself. We have the same expression in Norwegian: "Realitetene taler for seg selv."

.·: † :·.