Physics

It is a fact, men and women think a bit differently. Men might think strategically, which the woman have difficulties doing, disposed to think tactically, as she is. A woman might do the work of man (old Norwegian saying). The fact is, though, when stating a truth, she will always be bound to her gender – her body. In science, and in the art of poetry, a difference is to be seen between men and women.

In physics, there are three orientations. There is pure physics, there is chemistry, and there is biology. The way of thinking differs. The smallest particle in physics is the electron, in chemistry the atom, and in biology the cell. And it is my intuitive understanding the electronical activity in the body, in the nerves, that is, cannot be understood theoretically by pure physics. And chemistry cannot explain it. No reaction is to be found. And biology is not occupied with the beings of nerves. Bound to the material, electronical activity is difficult to explain. The electrons obviously are not free.

Neither in air, the electrons are free. Air is O². And there is no reaction taking place in air by blue-tooth, for example. So what? Is there a difference between women and men? Why is the woman bound?

I think there must be an electronical field around the globe, giving opportunity to electronical signals. This field is in the air, chemically speaking. O², that is. Electronical activity in the substance of air?

There are things to learn I believe, also in physics. Let us take the step?

[Addition - a couple of minutes after this posting:]

Sound might penetrate a wall, though being reduced. Why will not light?

.·: † :·.

Buddhism

Prove me wrong, though, to me it seems like there is a logical flaw in buddhism. The essence of buddhism, I understand, is reaching nirvana, which is a state of release and disembodiment, which one reaches through a correct path. That nirvana is material not to be, devoid as one is of motives and feelings, full of wisdom and correct values. The core value, though, seems to be discipline. There is a correct path, and devotion to beings. And that is the thing: One never is of no value and no worth, and speaking of it, who wants to be? By discipline, one becomes a follower, a student, a disciple, and as such, not to be of worth? Of no value to the school, to the church, the community, the society?

To me it seems buddhism is a path towards self-upheaval, by which one only is good, serving anyone. Though, precence? Who wants to be lost?

Does one better one's mind by concentration? Of course. Though, fixing it on a correct path? And on serving? Tragic, it is.

By the way; if nirvana is reachable, as a state of mind, dependent on learning, God is profane.

.·: † :·.

Take Care

.·: † :·.

The Being of God

Is God supposed to be a thing? Or rather, two things? Good and bad? How does one relate to a thing?

As child opposed to adult; will one not see and learn? As wife opposed to husband; will one not get it? As individual opposed to society; will one not perform a role? What is expectation? Something to disagree with?

This I made years ago:

If A and B are opposed, both are measures, and A and B are basically the same, where A is the positive thing and B is the negative thing, and the formula

x = √ A x B

would give us the measure. The ideal would be given by the calculation

2 = √ ( 2 x 2 )

It is as simple as that. Here is another example, where A and B have different value (calculate for yourself):

x = √ ( ( 1 x 2 x 3 x 3 x 2 x 1 ) ( 3 : 2 : 1 : 1 : 2 : 3 ) )

Is God a measure?

If balance is a thing; for how long will the perfect cross last, for goodness sake!

.·: † :·.

That Satan

Making

• discouraged
• terrified
• exhausted

= the motive of the pack. Hyena, and wolf.

Making

• paralyzed
• powerlesss

= the motive of the devil - the poisonous creep. Scorpion, spider, and snake.

.·: † :·.

Insanity

There are a number of broken peoples, these times. And by the word broken, in this blog post, I mean people tortured to loose sight and hope, and the twinkling in the eye. I have believed, and I think I have stated, somewhere, those broken ones are resurrected, and might belong to the first seed of the last era on earth. This, I have come to see, cannot be so. Experience tells us this cannot be so. Everyone gets older, and some have already died, of age. And this phenomenon of broken peoples is not new with today’s generation. Especially singing artists, though also others, as in some Christian societies in Norway ¹, obviously have been. Those have died of age. Listen to the songs of Nina Hagen and of Toyah, for example.

Insanity has to do with lack of mental authority. Mental care is making intellect. Without knowing it, I believe most broken ones in the organized crime of our days have been hypnotized after being broken. If so, one may ask what makes those people insane. Hypnoses surely is related to psychoses.

¹In Norwegian, please see: Anne Efskind: Motsetning i sosialt arbeid, Aschehoug, 1984.

.·: † :·.

Mind

.·: † :·.

Spirit

.·: † :·.

State of Affairs

King Salomon let write, in Ecclesiastes 7:28, he had not found a woman among thousand. He had thousand wives ... Well. Did he know of the muse?

.·: † :·.

Human Nature

What to expect from a Nordic son? A gorilla? An alligator, or a tiger? A kangaroo? An elephant? Of course not. A scorpion? No. A poisonous spider? No. And neither a lion. A Nordic man relates to moose. And bear. And badger, and deer. Besides sheep, and cow, pig and hen. Rooster, you see. A Nordic man knows of the viper, and knows of the wolf. Pack. Though, the viper is governed, in Norway, by law, and the wolfs are all counted, as bears are, in Norway. This, though, is not what the being of man is. The language is more prominent, speaking of nature. The language is dependent on nature, though many words are borrowed from abroad. As the word “nature” is.

What is integrity? What is getting hold of the son, valued, and thought of as worth? What is inheritance? The fathers were spokesmen, not slaves. Integrity, of course, has with morale to do. Not the cultural way of doing things, though way to go, morally. Perspectives differ, among families. Gift, work, and experience make it so. There is, though, a certain direction given in the culture. In art.

A Norwegian might be “forbannet”. No-one knows what this is, except a Nordic. And, perhaps a Russian. Weather is circumstance, in Norway. And so, home is necessity. “Hjem”. We do not make it cosy. We make it “hjemlig”. And a Norwegian might be “utilnærmelig”. Impossible to reach, that is. Introvert beyond degree. Indecency is not a word, in Norwegian. That juvenile delinquency might be understood, though, the equivalent word in Norwegian is “uskikkelig”. What is what one is when one does not behave, in a social context. Being bad, that is. Why? We find together. Nature, and climate, make togetherness a feeling. “Selvstendighet” is the Norwegian word for being private, both in the quantitative and the qualitative manner. Self-governed? In Norway? Self-assured? In Norway? Self-made? A son? Independence is the English translation. The focus is, though, a person standing tall, with confidence.

So, a Nordic son has got nature. And the word “integrity” might be understood as necessity, utility, or as beauty.

.·: † :·.